20. February 2023

OPPENLÄNDER provided antitrust advice to Daimler Truck AG

The deal centered on heavy and medium-duty internal combustion engines, in the further development of which Daimler Truck no longer intends to invest any funds. They are used in construction and agricultural machinery, for example. Daimler Truck announced in 2022 that it would focus primarily on locally CO2-neutral transport systems. Deutz intends to further develop the two engine series, including for the use of synthetic fuels.

Oppenländer’s antitrust lawyers, for whom Christoph Wolf and Natalie Seitz were mandated here, are among Daimler Truck’s regular contacts. In-house at Daimler Truck, Ines Heuchert and Julia Kurz were responsible for the antitrust aspects of the transaction.

Further information can be found in the JUVE release.

More news

12. February 2026

OPPENLÄNDER is once again among the best according to Legal500

In the recently published ranking of Legal 500 Germany 2026, we are once again a TOP LAW FIRM in the City Focus Stuttgart and are ranked as a TOP TIER LAW FIRM in two practice areas.

Read more
29. January 2026

OPPENLÄNDER Rechtsanwälte wins dispute over functional allowances for the Saarland state parliament

Prof. Dr. Christofer Lenz and Dr. Maximilian Gerhold successfully defended the Saarland state parliament against a constitutional complaint filed by an AfD member of parliament regarding the functional allowances for parliamentary secretaries and deputy faction leaders.

Read more
14. January 2026

OPPENLÄNDER strengthens its labor law and M&A practice with the addition of attorney Karoline Korff

Karoline Korff joined our team in labor law and M&A on January 1, 2026.

Read more
09. January 2026

State Parliament President wins tunnel dispute against AfD with OPPENLÄNDER

OPPENLÄNDER Rechtsanwälte, represented by Prof. Dr. Christofer Lenz and Dr. Henrike Schulte, has once again won a case for State Parliament President Muhterem Aras at the Constitutional Court of Baden-Württemberg. The AfD members of the state parliament and their parliamentary group had challenged decisions made by the president within the scope of her domiciliary rights regarding the arrangement of access to state parliament premises. This also concerned the use of a connecting tunnel beneath Konrad-Adenauer-Straße between the plenary building and the building housing the offices of the members of the major parliamentary groups of the Greens and the CDU.

Read more